1. Updated ViewComponent to exposes similar properties to the existing ones in controller where
appropiate. We've left out Resolver for being a bad pattern (just inject the dependency on the constructor
or use Context.RequestServices to access it if needed) and Response as although available through the Context
property, it shouldn't be used/modified in a ViewComponent.
2. Updated ViewViewComponentResult to follow a similar pattern as ViewResult where the constructor is
parameterless and elements like ViewEngine are resolved during execution if the user does not set the
associated property on the object.
3. Updated ExecuteAsync in JsonViewComponentResult to remove the unnecessary pragma and async keyword from the
signature and to use Task.FromResult(true) instead.
4. Cleaned up ViewViewComponentResult tests.
- provide list of users on Index page
- currently uses only the `<a/>` helper but left `<label/>` and `<input/>` comments
- get date picker working on Create and Edit pages
- add `[DataType]` annotation
- use format browsers recognize
nits:
- move "Create New" link to the bottom of `~/Home/Index`
- correct code comment about assigning to a `ViewBag` property
Right now these use a commandline adapter to inject some data into the
tests, but it's really not needed. Instead, these routes use a prefix to
ensure that the scenario under test is isolated.
- #EngineeringDay
- license present but incorrect in just a few files
- skip generated files such as Resources.Designer.cs and files under
test\Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.Razor.Host.Test\TestFiles\Output
- #EngineeringDay
- VS does not yet format auto-properties nicely; reverted what it did
Also revert changes under
- test/Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.Razor.Host.Test/TestFiles
- #EngineeringDay
- Total replaced: 660 Matching files: 270 in *.cs
- Total replaced: 250 Matching files: 32 in all other files
- Total replaced: 22 Matching files: 8 in a few stragglers
Did not change files under following directories
- test\Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.Razor.Host.Test\TestFiles\Output
- test\Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.FunctionalTests\compiler\resources
- test\WebSites\TagHelpersWebSite
(Razor generates trailing whitespace in a case or two)
For each of these TODOs:
- If there's an active bug tracking the work, and the TODO provides
something of value, I left it and standardized the formatting. I also
added comments to the bug.
- If the comment provided no value (implement feature X when we do feature
X), I deleted it with impunity.
- If the comment was stale (won't fix or just out of date), then we
removed it uncerimoniously.
There was a single TODO that was actually actionable, so I enabled that
test.
- TagHelperAttributeDescriptors changed to be lighterweight and not depend on PropertyInfo, had to modify our use of them to work with the new contract.
- scenarios where helper takes different code paths were not well-explored
nits:
- improve a few comments and names
- refactor some setup code into helper methods
- use `EmptyModelMetadataProvider`, not `DataAnnotationsModelMetadataProvider`
Test gap around `GenerateTextBox()`'s `format` argument is temporary.
- #1523
- remove `TagHelperOutput.Merge()` extension method entirely
- test tag name preservation with all MVC tag helpers
- `<input/>` tag helper generation of a checkbox wasn't previously tested
nits:
- fix argument order in a couple of `Assert.Equal()` calls
- remove use of "original tag name"
This change enables some compatibility scenarios with MVC 5 by expanding
the set of legal ways to configure attribute routing. Most promiently, the
following example is now legal:
[HttpPost]
[Route("Products")]
public void MyAction() { }
This will define a single action that accepts POST on route "Products".
See the comments in #1194 for a more detailed description of what changed
with more examples.
These tests verify that per-request services can be injected into assets
that users provide/implements (filters, constraints, controllers, views,
etc).
The purpose is to verify that the services are correctly resolved from the
per-request service container, and don't have state that lingers and
influences the next request. This is important because changing the
lifetime of a framework services could easily impact the lifetimes of
others, and ultimately of something the user created.
Rather than throwing here, this does what routing does. If request
services aren't set, we just create our own scope.
This will NOT create an extra scope if request services are already set.
Ryan Nowak
Harsh Gupta
Yishai Galatzer
Ajay Bhargav Baaskaran
Victor Hurdugaci
Hao Kung
N. Taylor Mullen
Doug Bunting
Pranav K
Kirthi Krishnamraju
ianhong