* React to Razor.Design package removal
* Remove references to packages (Razor.Design, Razor.Extensions) solely used to bring in compiler \ targets
* Target netcoreapp3.0 in samples and tests to allow Sdk to infer values
* Cleanup InferParameterBindingInfoConvention
* Infer BindingSource for collection parameters as Body. Fixes https://github.com/aspnet/Mvc/issues/8536
* Introduce a compat switch to keep 2.1.x LTS behavior for collection parameters
* Do not infer BinderModelName in InferParameterBindingInfoConvention
* Convert `RouteValueDictionary` values to `string` using `CultureInfo.InvariantCulture`
- #8578
- user may override this choice in one case:
- register a custom `IValueProviderFactory` to pass another `CultureInfo` into the `RouteValueProvider`
- values are used as programmatic tokens outside `RouteValueProvider`
nits:
- take VS suggestions in changed classes
- take VS suggestions in files I had open :)
- avoid "Skipping test case with duplicate ID" messages
- xUnit gets confused when `[Theory]`s are overridden
- avoid "falling back to single test case" messages
- fix inspired by aspnet/SignalR#1820
- #8593
- also find `IDocumentProvider` using a more-laborious process
- `Type.GetType(string)` requires an assembly-qualified name and we don't know the assembly
- default method name now `GenerateAsync`
- only supported signature is `public Task GenerateAsync(string, TextWriter)`
also:
- handle more error cases in the tool's inside man
- avoid an empty document file if `IDocumentProvider.GenerateAsync(...)` fails
- unwrap an `AggregateException`
nits:
- remove duplicate comments
- change `GetDocumentCommandWorker.TryProcess(...)` to return `false` on failure
- minor because return value is currently ignored
- rename `GetDocumentCommandContext.Output` -> `OutputPath`
- reflect recent change to `dotnet-getdocument`'s `Resources.resx` file in its designer file
This doesn't really accomplish our goals for 2.2 - I don't have a clear
scenario where I would tell a developer to use this VS something else.
Will reevaluate in 3.0
To enable custom handling of antiforgery validation failures, use an
`AntiforgeryValidationFailedResult` which is just a `BadRequestResult`
but allows to be identified explicitly inside always-running result
filters using the `IAntiforgeryValidationFailedResult` marker interface.
Pranav K
Ryan Nowak
Doug Bunting
Piotr Wosiek
Doug Bunting
James Newton-King
Patrick Westerhoff
ASP.NET CI