- #2836
Part 1: Use existing property values when recursing in `MutableObjectModelBinder`
- remove `ComplexModelDTO` because that indirection made fixing this issue more difficult and doesn't add value
- started with an old closed PR (#2241) which did some of this work
- correct `MutableObjectModelBinderTest` tests that exercised behaviour that can't occur
- the old `dto.Results` dictionary was never incomplete; nor could it contain `null` values
Part 2: Change `MutableObjectModelBinder` to pass complex property values into binding system
- model binding no longer trounces nodes in the model tree that aren't bound
- create model instances less often in `TryUpdateModel` scenarios
- refactor `EnsureModel()` to `GetModel()` and use appropriately
- reorder logic in `SetProperty()` and `AddToProperty()` to avoid copying to / from the same collection
- also cleans up some code duplication
nits:
- clean up `MutableObjectModelBinderTest`
- fix odd line wrappings and indentation
- use `nameof()` more
- use `string.Empty` more
- simplify a couple of `Returns()` expressions
- make assertions in `TryUpdateModelIntegrationTest` more readable
- no need to work through `ModelStateDictionary.Keys`
- also use `Length` instead of `Count()`; test code but we don't need Linq at all in that test class
* Relying on git log --exit-code to fail in case there are unmerged
changes in the release branch.
* Specifically update aspnetvnext feed when branching to release.
- It broke the composition model by allowing you to
reach out to the original app builder. This breaks
the ability to properly wrap and have all configure
methods see the wrapper.
Doug Bunting
Stephen Halter
Pranav K
Troy Dai
Brice Lambson
Chris R
David Fowler
Ryan Nowak