- Made @inject handle trailing semicolons identical to @using; essentially ignores it.
- Added parser, runtime/designtime codegen and functional tests.
- Added Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.Common.Test.
- Transitioned pre-existing Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.Common tests to the new test project.
- Updated transitioned tests to also work in CoreCLR (except ones with moq).
#1857
This change makes ApiDescription and ApiParameterDescription aware of all
of the new features we built into model binding for enhanced DTO support
(uber-binding).
The main change is that instead of sticking just to the declared
parameters on the action itself, we now traverse model metadata and break
the parameters down based on their logical data source.
This means that a model like the below will yield 3 parameters:
public class ProductChangeCommandDTO
{
public int Id { get; set; }
[FromBody]
public ProductDetails Changes { get; set; }
[FromQuery]
public string AdminComments { get; set; }
[FromServices]
public IProductRepository Repository { get; set; }
}
The 'Repository' will be hidden, as it's not related to user input.
Additionally, we treat different sources differently. In the
above example, 'Changes' is from the body and will be treated as a
leaf-node.
However if you use nested DTOs that are bound from the query string (using
[FromQuery]) or similar, we'll recursively explore to find as much
structure as possible.
This information is combined with data from the route template to give a
much more complete picture than we ever could in the past for parameters,
especially when DTO/Command pattern is used.
This change moves controller creation to the stage immediately before
model binding. The controller will be disposed/released before Resource
Filters run their 'OnResourceExecuted' method. Previously the controller's
lifetime surrounded all filter invocation.
Additionally, the Controller property is now gone from ActionContext, and
is moved to the 4 filter contexts that should have access to it
Action*Context and Result*Context.
This is a major change to how we handle the scenario where a controller is
a filter. We want to change the lifetime of the controller object, by
scoping it around action filters and result filters. This means that a
controller class can only implement action filters and result filters.
To implement #384 - we're creating a delegating filter class
'ControllerFilter' which will forward calls to the implementation of the
controller. This is discovered in the controller model and added to the
filter collection. This filter is removable as an opt-out of this feature.
The ControllerFilter only implements action filter and result filter, so
the new restriction about filter types on Controller is in place. A future
change will move the instantiation of the controller to after resource
filters.
This is a major change to how we handle the scenario where a controller is
a filter. We want to change the lifetime of the controller object, by
scoping it around action filters and result filters. This means that a
controller class can only implement action filters and result filters.
To implement #384 - we're creating a delegating filter class
'ControllerFilter' which will forward calls to the implementation of the
controller. This is discovered in the controller model and added to the
filter collection. This filter is removable as an opt-out of this feature.
The ControllerFilter only implements action filter and result filter, so
the new restriction about filter types on Controller is in place. A future
change will move the instantiation of the controller to after resource
filters.
This change adds support for our three-valued logic to the default value
handling part of the MutableObjectModelBinder.
The issue is that we want to look up a default value when a 'greedy' model
binder returns true but doesn't find a value.
We also don't want to call the property setter unless there is:
1). A value from model binding OR
2). A default value
In general all properties are get/set so filters can change them.
- some validate for not-null
- where we use services it's get/set also
Services are resolved in the Execute method if not provided.
A few more ActionResults that return a body have the ability to set a
status code now (optional).
- React to aspnet/Razor#221
- Modified existing TagHelper tests to no longer rely on ContentBehavior.
- Updated signatures of TagHelperExecutionContext and TagHelperContext pieces.
- React to aspnet/Razor#221
- Modified existing TagHelpers to no longer rely on ContentBehavior and to instead utilize GetChildContentAsync, PreContent, Content and PostContent.
- #1685
- move `ValidationSummary` type to the `Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc` namespace
- update tests and samples to match
- remove tests for case-insensitivity of `ValidationSummary` property values
- part II of #1253
- an expected case in template .cshtml files
- expression has name `""`; led to `ArgumentException` in `ModelExpression`
- test `@Model` and `@model.Property` in unit and functional tests
- update baselines to match
nits:
- remove a few unecessary `@`s in .cshtml files
- correct field names & ids in ProductList.cshtml (`foreach` confuses MVC)
- led to correct valiation attributes as well
- part I of #1253 using new Razor capabilities
- update baselines to match latest code generation
- use new `CodeBuilderContext` and `TagHelperAttributeValueCodeRenderer` signatures
- test complex expressions in bound non-string attribute values
See #1695 for a detailed explanation. This change builds support into the
system for the case that a model binder returns true without setting a
value for the Model.
In this case, validation will be skipped if it's a top-level object.
Note that explicitly setting null will still run validation.
This is a demonstration of how to inject an IRouter in between traditional
routes and MVC's handler. This allows you to accomplish a variety of
things that were possible with WebAPIs handlers, but inside the routing
system.
The example here turns a header representing the user into a locale, which
is used to select a controller. You could do other things like reject the
route match or change link generation.
There is one subtle project change here, to allow the same to be possible
for attribute routing, we need to create the attribute route after running
the user's routing configuration code.