* Include the response type in ProducesResponseType for client errors
* Refactor ActualApiResponseMetadata discovery in to a separate more manageable type
* Annotate action result ctors and helper methods that specify the "object" value with attribute
* Modify the discovery of parameters to match ActionResultObjectValueAttribute and ActionResultStatusCodeAttribute by name
to allow users to write and annotate custom helper methods and action results, a la NotNullAttribute.
Fixes#8345
- #8180
- add an error when binding fails for top-level model
- same case as when MVC creates "default" / empty model i.e. `ParameterBinder` can't detect this
- update `CollectionModelBinder` subclasses and the various providers as well
- controlled by existing `MvcOptions.AllowValidatingTopLevelNodes` option
smaller issue:
- change `ModelBinding_MissingBindRequiredMember` resource to mention parameters too
This allows users to use `ProducesAttribute` to specify the content-type
for action results such as FileStreamResult where the result determines the content type
and the specified value is informational.
Fixes https://github.com/aspnet/Mvc/issues/5701
- 30a5eda508 / origin/prkrishn/form-file-value-provider
Was:
Design: Use a value provider to allow nested form files
Fixes https://github.com/aspnet/Mvc/issues/7562
- #7562 part 2
- add `OriginalModelName` to `ModelBindingContext`
nit: take VS suggestions, mostly to inline collection initialization in `FormFileModelBinderTest`
Currently MVC is still running the IActionConstraint implementations for
features that we've already moved into the routing layer. This has a
significant perf cost associated with, and so we want to skip it because
it's redundant. However if anyone has implemented their own
`IActionConstraint`-based features, they still need to just work.
This change takes the approach of skipping the action constraint phase
at runtime unless we see something 'unknown'. This is an all or nothing
choice, and will run action constraints if **any** action constraint we
don't special case exists. This is the most compatible behavior (running
redundant constraints) when the application is using constraints that
the developer implemented.
Another approach I considered was to eliminate these constraints as part
of the process of building ADs. I don't think that's ideal because
people have written code that introspects action constraints. We should
consider something like this in 3.0.
Validates that the type used as a generic argument in WebApplicaitonFactory is contained within the entry point to assembly and throws InvalidOperationException otherwise
James Newton-King
Pranav K
Ryan Nowak
Doug Bunting
Simon Cropp
N. Taylor Mullen
Ryan Brandenburg
Casey O'Brien
Kristian Hellang
Ben Adams