- #8428
- add signing-related and PackageVerifier configuration for new package
- remove packaging configuration from dotnet-getdocument project
- adjust `dotnet-getdocument` invocation to its new location
- remove use of nonexistent (ignored) `dotnet-getdocument --no-build` option
Remove `--uri` feature from `dotnet-getdocument`
- reduce dependencies from Microsoft.AspNetCore.TestHost to Microsoft.AspNetCore.Hosting.Abstractions
- assume web site depends on that
- merge `DownloadFileCore` into `DownloadFile`
- remove other unecessary code e.g. `WrappedException` was never `throw`n
Correct issues in `DownloadFile`
- e.g. dispose of `responseStream`, use `await` more, support FIPS-compliant machines
nits:
- clean up `Project` and the metadata it fetches
- remove unnecessary `.props` and `.targets` files
- follow-ups to 1646345955 and 9d109f5956
- fix `%(Command)` updates in `DefaultDocumentGenerator` target
- later references to metadata values set within an item are not up-to-date
- qualify values for `%(SourceProject)`, `%(SourceUri)` and `%(SourceDocument)` when setting that metadata
- MSBuild can't distinguish unqualified metadata references unless using `<X Update="@(X)">`
- fix `@(CurrentServiceFileReference)` items
- was a copy 'n paste error in `_ServiceFileReferenceGenerator_Core` target
- remove per-language default namespace values
- do not add TypeScript files to `@(Compile)`; generally enhance final item additions
- use `$(DefaultLanguageSourceExtension)` to help here
- exclude generated source files with `%(OutputPath)` that does not match `$(DefaultLanguageSourceExtension)`
- really support `%(OutputPath)` directories
- stick with current `$(TargetFramework)` when building `...ReferenceGenerator_Inner` targets
- `%(ProjectTargetFramework)` will not exist for all `@(ServiceFileReference)` items
- building the current project, not a service project; `%(ProjectTargetFramework)` may not be supported
nits:
- shorten a few more long lines in Microsoft.Extensions.ApiDescription.Client.targets
- reduce logging from that file
- do not include `%(SerializedMetadata)` in `%(SerializedMetadata)`
- caused extra-long serialization of items that were originally `@(ServiceProjectReference)`s
- add more info to various comments
- always use element syntax for metadata additions
- related to #8419 and (more generally) #7947
- add errors for missing required metadata
- add errors for duplicate `%(DocumentPath)` and `%(OutputPath)` metadata
- remove `[Required]` for task inputs that may be `null` or empty
- correct `%(DocumentPath)`s generated in `GetProjectReferenceMetadata` task
- use this task
- #8419
- perform batching and `@(ServiceFileReference)` and `@(Compile)` additions in common code
- take advantage of new simplicity in `DefaultDocumentGenerator` target
- add metadata serialization / deserialization in support of passing items into `<MSBuild />`
- also ensure metadata values are escaped before calling `ITaskItem.SetMetadata(...)`
- correct typos in Microsoft.Extensions.ApiDescription.Client.* e.g. in comments and metadata names
- move last remaining `GenerationTasks` file
nits:
- combine `_ServiceProjectReferenceGenerator_Restore` and `_ServiceProjectReferenceGenerator_Build` targets
- only build web sites projects once
- remove unused `buildMultiTargeting` targets
- remove qualification of metadata listed in an `<ItemDefinitionGroup />`; will always exist
- add / remove a few `Condition`s that were missing / redundant
- move properties users won't normally set to Microsoft.Extensions.ApiDescription.Client.targets
- shorten lines in MSBuild files
- use same generator as most other projects in aspnet repos
- were not using named arguments to resource methods anyhow
- update resources to use regular (numbered) format parameters
- adjust to new `Resources` namespace; no need for separate `using`
- use `Format...(...)` methods as necessary
- also cleared out most uses of `GetDocument` and `GenerationTasks` in MSBuild and strings
- temporarily fixed up T4 templates, adding Resources.tt (will remove custom generation soon)
- should resolve issues with occasional strange MSBuild caching issues in this repo
- modeled after aspnet/Scaffolding#905
- follows aspnet/BuildTools#729 recommendation to check in global.config file
- see also Microsoft/msbuild#2914
- use newer KoreBuild
- `.\build.cmd -update /t:noop`
* Include the response type in ProducesResponseType for client errors
* Refactor ActualApiResponseMetadata discovery in to a separate more manageable type
* Annotate action result ctors and helper methods that specify the "object" value with attribute
* Modify the discovery of parameters to match ActionResultObjectValueAttribute and ActionResultStatusCodeAttribute by name
to allow users to write and annotate custom helper methods and action results, a la NotNullAttribute.
Fixes#8345
- #8180
- add an error when binding fails for top-level model
- same case as when MVC creates "default" / empty model i.e. `ParameterBinder` can't detect this
- update `CollectionModelBinder` subclasses and the various providers as well
- controlled by existing `MvcOptions.AllowValidatingTopLevelNodes` option
smaller issue:
- change `ModelBinding_MissingBindRequiredMember` resource to mention parameters too
This allows users to use `ProducesAttribute` to specify the content-type
for action results such as FileStreamResult where the result determines the content type
and the specified value is informational.
Fixes https://github.com/aspnet/Mvc/issues/5701
- #7562 part 2
- add `OriginalModelName` to `ModelBindingContext`
nit: take VS suggestions, mostly to inline collection initialization in `FormFileModelBinderTest`
Change tokens can call into your code IMMEDIATELY when you subscribe. I
reviewed our other usage of ChangeToken.OnChange in MVC and everything
looks good.
Currently MVC is still running the IActionConstraint implementations for
features that we've already moved into the routing layer. This has a
significant perf cost associated with, and so we want to skip it because
it's redundant. However if anyone has implemented their own
`IActionConstraint`-based features, they still need to just work.
This change takes the approach of skipping the action constraint phase
at runtime unless we see something 'unknown'. This is an all or nothing
choice, and will run action constraints if **any** action constraint we
don't special case exists. This is the most compatible behavior (running
redundant constraints) when the application is using constraints that
the developer implemented.
Another approach I considered was to eliminate these constraints as part
of the process of building ADs. I don't think that's ideal because
people have written code that introspects action constraints. We should
consider something like this in 3.0.
Doug Bunting
James Newton-King
David J. Quiroga
Ryan Nowak
Pranav K
Alexej Timonin
Nate McMaster
Simon Cropp