- was trying out rules matching frequest PR comments (then)
- did a manual scan to find new instances of same issues
- "" -> `string.Empty`
- `String` -> `string` and similar
- fill empty XML doc elements
- ignored `JsonPatchDocument<TModel>`; just too many empty elements
- corrected missing / extra / out-of-order `<param>` descriptions
- `xml-docs-test` detects incorrect external references but not these local issues
- ICodeTreeCache => IChunkTreeCache
- ModelCodeGenerator => ModelChunkGenerator
- MvcCSharpCodeBuilder => MvcCSharpCodeGenerator
- Updated files that used Razor resources that are now in different namespaces.
- Updated variable names to account for Razor renames.
aspnet/Razor#140
- also rename files and directories with "GlobalImport" in name
- nearly blind but avoid "ViewImportss" in new names
- public API change: `ViewHierarchyUtility.GetGlobalImportLocations()` -> `GetViewImportsLocations()`
- primary source updates were comments, tests, and implementation details
nit:
- rename NestedGlobalImports.cs file to NestedViewImportsController.cs, matching class
- Tooling passes in rooted paths when asking for a RazorParser for a file. This was problematic when resolving inherited code trees and ultimately this commit tests that.
#2213
- #EngineeringDay
- VS does not yet format auto-properties nicely; reverted what it did
Also revert changes under
- test/Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.Razor.Host.Test/TestFiles
- #EngineeringDay
- Total replaced: 660 Matching files: 270 in *.cs
- Total replaced: 250 Matching files: 32 in all other files
- Total replaced: 22 Matching files: 8 in a few stragglers
Did not change files under following directories
- test\Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.Razor.Host.Test\TestFiles\Output
- test\Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.FunctionalTests\compiler\resources
- test\WebSites\TagHelpersWebSite
(Razor generates trailing whitespace in a case or two)
For each of these TODOs:
- If there's an active bug tracking the work, and the TODO provides
something of value, I left it and standardized the formatting. I also
added comments to the bug.
- If the comment provided no value (implement feature X when we do feature
X), I deleted it with impunity.
- If the comment was stale (won't fix or just out of date), then we
removed it uncerimoniously.
There was a single TODO that was actually actionable, so I enabled that
test.