Fix - When the model is passed in to a View, ViewDataDictionary sets it. During this process, we recurse through all the properties and create FastPropertyGetters for each of them. In this case, since it is an enumerable, the properties which we recurse through are not the elements of the collection but the properties of the Enumerable instead. i.e - Enumerable.Current. Creating getters for these properties are not necessary. The fix moves the property iteration step to a place where the properties are actually requested.
- Splitting TypeInformation class into two and separating their caches appropriately.
The issue is that responses to HEAD cannot have a body. When running these
tests on a real server, they break because the server throws when you try
to write to the body.
Project/Assembly names are all like 'FeatureWebSite' root namespaces
updated accordingly. This makes processing all of the functional tests and
deploying the web sites much simpler.
The issue here is that a model state error is added with the model name
'doubled'. This is on a fairly obscure code path and the code dates back
to the original WSR git checkin of webapi. There are no wsr tests that
verify this behavior.
The cause here is that our 'greedy' model binders (like
FromHeaderModelBinder) return 'true' whether or not they successfully
found a model, because they don't want other model binders to run.
This also has an effect on the validation system. That means that
validators will run and attempt to validate the model (which may be null).
That's that rare case where we get to this code path.
Right now these use a commandline adapter to inject some data into the
tests, but it's really not needed. Instead, these routes use a prefix to
ensure that the scenario under test is isolated.
- #EngineeringDay
- license present but incorrect in just a few files
- skip generated files such as Resources.Designer.cs and files under
test\Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.Razor.Host.Test\TestFiles\Output
- #EngineeringDay
- VS does not yet format auto-properties nicely; reverted what it did
Also revert changes under
- test/Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.Razor.Host.Test/TestFiles
- #EngineeringDay
- Total replaced: 660 Matching files: 270 in *.cs
- Total replaced: 250 Matching files: 32 in all other files
- Total replaced: 22 Matching files: 8 in a few stragglers
Did not change files under following directories
- test\Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.Razor.Host.Test\TestFiles\Output
- test\Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.FunctionalTests\compiler\resources
- test\WebSites\TagHelpersWebSite
(Razor generates trailing whitespace in a case or two)
For each of these TODOs:
- If there's an active bug tracking the work, and the TODO provides
something of value, I left it and standardized the formatting. I also
added comments to the bug.
- If the comment provided no value (implement feature X when we do feature
X), I deleted it with impunity.
- If the comment was stale (won't fix or just out of date), then we
removed it uncerimoniously.
There was a single TODO that was actually actionable, so I enabled that
test.
This change enables some compatibility scenarios with MVC 5 by expanding
the set of legal ways to configure attribute routing. Most promiently, the
following example is now legal:
[HttpPost]
[Route("Products")]
public void MyAction() { }
This will define a single action that accepts POST on route "Products".
See the comments in #1194 for a more detailed description of what changed
with more examples.
These tests verify that per-request services can be injected into assets
that users provide/implements (filters, constraints, controllers, views,
etc).
The purpose is to verify that the services are correctly resolved from the
per-request service container, and don't have state that lingers and
influences the next request. This is important because changing the
lifetime of a framework services could easily impact the lifetimes of
others, and ultimately of something the user created.
This is the MVC companion to https://github.com/aspnet/Routing/pull/122
As routing flows, routes replace the route data and mutate a copy. This
allows users to make changes that dirty the data without affecting
undesired state changes.
We also add the 'next' router for diagnostic purposes.