On a web server, this test ends up giving back a 204 because of the MVC
behavior when an action is declared to return void. The fix is to use
EmptyResult.
paths.
This website is written to assume that $pwd is always in the functional
tests directory when it's launched. This works fine for the functional
tests, but causes issues in many other contexts, including VS.
The issue is that responses to HEAD cannot have a body. When running these
tests on a real server, they break because the server throws when you try
to write to the body.
Project/Assembly names are all like 'FeatureWebSite' root namespaces
updated accordingly. This makes processing all of the functional tests and
deploying the web sites much simpler.
Adding dependencies and commands for iis, web listener and khestrel to each
site.
Each website comes with a readme.md to 'anchor' the otherwise empty
folder. We have another work item tracking adding content to these.
Once VS sees a project with a wwwroot, it wants to assign a port for iis,
so I let it.
Right now these use a commandline adapter to inject some data into the
tests, but it's really not needed. Instead, these routes use a prefix to
ensure that the scenario under test is isolated.
- #EngineeringDay
- license present but incorrect in just a few files
- skip generated files such as Resources.Designer.cs and files under
test\Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.Razor.Host.Test\TestFiles\Output
- #EngineeringDay
- VS does not yet format auto-properties nicely; reverted what it did
Also revert changes under
- test/Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.Razor.Host.Test/TestFiles
- #EngineeringDay
- Total replaced: 660 Matching files: 270 in *.cs
- Total replaced: 250 Matching files: 32 in all other files
- Total replaced: 22 Matching files: 8 in a few stragglers
Did not change files under following directories
- test\Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.Razor.Host.Test\TestFiles\Output
- test\Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.FunctionalTests\compiler\resources
- test\WebSites\TagHelpersWebSite
(Razor generates trailing whitespace in a case or two)
For each of these TODOs:
- If there's an active bug tracking the work, and the TODO provides
something of value, I left it and standardized the formatting. I also
added comments to the bug.
- If the comment provided no value (implement feature X when we do feature
X), I deleted it with impunity.
- If the comment was stale (won't fix or just out of date), then we
removed it uncerimoniously.
There was a single TODO that was actually actionable, so I enabled that
test.
This change enables some compatibility scenarios with MVC 5 by expanding
the set of legal ways to configure attribute routing. Most promiently, the
following example is now legal:
[HttpPost]
[Route("Products")]
public void MyAction() { }
This will define a single action that accepts POST on route "Products".
See the comments in #1194 for a more detailed description of what changed
with more examples.
These tests verify that per-request services can be injected into assets
that users provide/implements (filters, constraints, controllers, views,
etc).
The purpose is to verify that the services are correctly resolved from the
per-request service container, and don't have state that lingers and
influences the next request. This is important because changing the
lifetime of a framework services could easily impact the lifetimes of
others, and ultimately of something the user created.
This is the MVC companion to https://github.com/aspnet/Routing/pull/122
As routing flows, routes replace the route data and mutate a copy. This
allows users to make changes that dirty the data without affecting
undesired state changes.
We also add the 'next' router for diagnostic purposes.
The change here is to always use the provided formatter, instead of using
it as a fallback. This is much less surprising for users.
There are some other subtle changes here and cleanup of the tests, as well
as documentation additions.
The primary change is that we still want to run 'select' on a formatter
even if it's the only one. This allows us to choose a content type based
on the accept header.
In the case of a user-provided formatter, we'll try to honor the best
possible combination of Accept and specified ContentTypes (specified
ContentTypes win if there's a conflict). If nothing works, we'll still run
the user-provided formatter and let it decide what to do.
In the case of the default (formatters from options) we do conneg, and if
there's a conflict, fall back to a global (from services)
JsonOutputFormatter - we let it decide what to do.
This should leave us with a defined and tested behavior for all cases.
This change adds the concept of a full-name to viewcomponents. View
components can be invoked using either the short name or long name. If the
provided string contains a '.' character, then it will be compared against
full names, otherwise it will be matched against short names only.
The short name is used for view lookups.
If the name is explicitly set via ViewComponent attribute, then the full
name is the name provided. The short name is the portion of the name after
the last '.'. If there are no dots, then the short name and full name are
the same.
If the name is not set explicitly, then it is inferred from the Type and
namespace name. The short name is the Type name, minus the 'ViewComponent'
suffix (if present). The full name is the namespace of the defining class,
plus the short name.
Ryan Nowak
Pranav K
Harsh Gupta
Kirthi Krishnamraju
ianhong
Mugdha Kulkarni
Kiran Challa
Praburaj
Yishai Galatzer
Ajay Bhargav Baaskaran
Victor Hurdugaci
Doug Bunting
Hao Kung
sornaks