Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Harsh Gupta 53ef8258bb The model state keys for body bound models which are bound at property will use the entire model name with this change for example
Consider

public class Person
{
    [FromBody]
    public Address Address { get; set; }
}

public class Address
{
   [Required]
   public string Street { get; set; }

   public int Zip { get; set; }
}

Request body { "Zip" : 12345 }
In this case the error key would be "prefix.Address.Street" (assuming there is a prefix because of additional metadata/positioning for/of the Person model).

public class Person
{
       [Required]
       public string Name { get; set; }
}

public void Action([FromBody]Person p)
{
}
Request body { }
In this case the prefix gets ignored and the error key is Name.
Please note this is so that we are compatible with MVC 5.0

public class Person
{
       [Required]
       public string Name { get; set; }
}

public void Action([FromBody][ModelBinder(Name = "prefix")] Person p)
{
}

public void Action2([FromBody][Bind(Name = "prefix")] Person p)
{
}
Request body { }
In both these cases (Action and Action2) the prefix gets ignored and the error key is Name.
This is a slight improvement from mvc, as in MVC the action parameter would be null.

The followup for this would be to fix #2416 -
This PR ignores the validation assuming that #2416 will address the issues and update the test.

NOTE: previous versions of mvc did not have property binding and hence there is no precedence in this case. For MVC and Web API it was possible to body bind an action parameter which used an empty prefix instead of a parameter name for adding errors to model state (In case of MVC if a custom prefix was provided, it failed binding from body i.e the parameter was null).
2015-04-22 14:02:08 -07:00
Pranav K f9d53e341c * Simplify MvcOptions
* Remove facades for accessing Options<T> and pass options to the invoker

Fixes #2266
Fixes #2269
2015-04-07 14:45:53 -07:00
Harsh Gupta adeb1ba194 Adding support for model binding specifically marked controller properties. 2015-03-20 17:37:09 -07:00
Ryan Nowak f5e7a69693 Updates to the extensibility for validator providers
This change removes reflection from validator providers, and instead
relies on cached metadata in in the modelmetadata.

In general this means that our MVPs don't need to cache anything, they
just look at the metadata and create what they need.

In the case of data-annotations, we update the model details provider to
add validation attributes to the modelmetadata. This would allow someone
to replace the DataAnnotationsValidatorProvider, but still use the
metadata in these attributes.

The change to the IModelValidatorProvider api (to use a context) is
intended to minimize allocations. Currently each validator provider needs
to return a list so you end up with N+1 lists (N validators + a final list
to compine them all). This change will let us just create the final list
(and a small context object). This is a very very high traffic API so it
seemed worth doing.

There's also some general massaging of namespaces and file locations.
2015-03-20 15:19:25 -07:00
Ryan Nowak 90cef3b9ca Refactor of the model metadata provider
Separates the MMP into two phases:
1). Creation of the ModelMetadata, discovery of properties and attributes
(reflection) is part of the MMP
2). Lookup of details based on attributes is now part of another phase,
and has its results cached.

Users can now implements and register an IFooMetadataProvider to customize
a single aspect of metadata (see how data annotations does it).
2015-03-05 13:19:10 -08:00
Ryan Nowak 9d5364cf9b Removing ModelMetadata.Model 2015-02-23 19:56:59 -08:00
N. Taylor Mullen df4b92b1c1 Update MVC projects to utilize Common repo classes.
- Had to add extra dependencies to work around aspnet/XRE#1237.
- Updated src and test projects.
2015-02-22 18:23:28 -08:00
Harsh Gupta 85b6382c69 Fix for #563 - FromForm, FromQuery and FromValue allow providing a Name which is used as a prefix. Also the name is used for reporting model state errors. 2015-02-18 16:48:12 -08:00
Harsh Gupta f19c2e493d Merging Model Validation for body and non body validation.
This also fixes #1503.

Currently all model binders except mutable object binder are independent of validation code. The mutable object binder which needs to do some validation ( for scenarios involving [BindRequired] and [BindNever]).
We would be going with an approach where required validaiton happens in input formatters and model binders.
This is needed as validation for value types can best be done at creation time.

Followup PRs:
Introduce support for skipping validation (and not binding) for a particular property/type etc.
2015-02-17 11:50:39 -08:00