This change adds the ability to merge sibling nodes when possible during
markup block rewriting. We retain that invariant that each markup block
is a valid chunk of markup containing properly nested tags.
We still haven't done any work to remove whitespace yet, so most of the
cases where this comes into play right now will merge an element with
its surrounding whitespace.
* Reenable HtmlBlock unit tests
* Add E2E tests for HTML Block cases
* Remove harded GenerateBaselines=true
* Fix#1193
This commit addresses the root cause of #1193. When we merge HTML
text nodes into HTML blocks we need to re-encode any HTML entities that
were encoded eariler.
I did a bit of a deep dive on how HTML encoding is handled in Blazor and
I think this is the best strategy. I think it's valuable that the
BrowserRenderer uses document.createTextNode, which will always encode
the text - this handles dynamic content. We want to keep this in place
to avoid HTML injection attacks.
* Fix#1265 Reenable MarkupBlock
* test cleanup
* Add HTML Block rewriter
* Baseline updates
* test gaps
* Update some unit tests to represent same behavior as before
* Define Markup frame type. Tests for rendering markup frames into render tree.
* Support markup frames during diffing (retain, insert, update, delete)
* Support markup blocks on WebAssembly
* Support rendering markup frames with server-side execution too
* Support markup blocks with multiple top-level nodes. Support updating markup dynamically.
* Define MarkupString type as a way to insert dynamic markup without needing custom RenderFragment code
* Remove comment
* CR: Better null value handling
This change introduces a mechanism for bypassing type checking and then
uses for the 'event handlers'. The event handler tag helpers have some
ideosyncratic behaviors and rely on overloading at the render tree
builder level.
This change replaces the parsing of HTML that we perform during the code
generation phase, which parsing of HTML during the IR lowering phase.
The main benefit of this change is that the structure of the HTML is
reflected in the IR tree, allowing us to do more more advance
transformations.
As an example, see how the the handling of `<script>` tags is now a
separate pass.
As an aside from this I also redesigned the structure of component IR
nodes to match the new HTML element nodes. Passes are now more easily
aware of the nodes they are expected to handle and are more easily aware
of the difference between a component and element. This still isn't as
clean as I would like, but I think it's a reasonable improvement.
Another benefit of this is that the code generation is much simpler and
requires much less bookkeeping and statefulness.
* Before refactoring ParameterCollection assignment logic, add more test coverage
* Begin caching parameter assignment info
* Factor out some reflection code to a reusable location
* Use IPropertySetter to avoid all per-property-assignment reflection
* More error cases and tests for parameter assignment
* Enable binding to nonpublic properties
* Add analyzer to warn and provide fix for public component parameters
* Unit test for analyzer
* Component tag helper now includes private properties if they have [Parameter]
* CR feedback: Remove garbage from csproj
* CR feedback: Rename .Build.Analyzers to .Analyzers
* CR feedback: Move BlazorApi.cs to shared; use it from Analyzers test
* Fix incorrect test name
* Make as many parameters private as possible. Replace ILayoutComponent with BlazorLayoutComponent.
* In component tag helper discovery, consider private members too
* Reduce the work in component parameter discovery by not inspecting the BlazorComponent base class (or System.Object)
This change introduces ParameterAttribute to specify a bindable
component parameter. As of the 0.3 release of Blazor we plan to make
[Parameter] required to make a property bindable by callers.
This also applies to parameters when their value is set by the
infrastructure, such as `Body` for layouts, and route paramters.
The rationale behind this change is that we think there is a need to
separate the definition of properties from their suitability for a
caller to set them through markup. We plan to introduce more features in
this area in the future such as marking parameters as required. This is
first step, and we think that this approach will scale nicely as we add
more functionaly.
The 0.3 release seems like the right time to change this behavior since
we're also introducing `ref` for captures in this release.
This change adds support for mapping DOM event handlers as tag helpers
that function in a bi-modal way.
This is a new first-class feature for DOM events, and replaces a few
workarounds like using `@onclick(...)` or `click=@{ ... }`. I haven't
removed those things yet, this is a first pass to get the new support
in, we'll remove those things when we're totally satisfied.
When used with a string like `<button onclick="foo" />` the result is
a simple HTML attribute .
But when used with an implicit expression like
`<button onclick="@Foo" />` or
`<button onclick="@(x => Clicked = true)" />` a C# function is bound to
the click event from the DOM.
This change introduces a 'tag helper' that replaces @bind with custom
code generation that accomplishes roughly the same thing.
This feature lights up by dynamically generating tag helpers that are
visible to tooling and affect the code generation based on:
- pattern recognition of component properties
- attributes that create definitions for elements
- a 'fallback' case for elements
'bind' also supports format strings (currently only for DateTime) via
a separate attribute.
This change introduces the basic framework for bind and tooling support.
We know that we'll have to do more work to define the set of default
'bind' cases for the DOM and to flesh out the conversion/formatting
infrastructure.
This change gets us far enough to replace all of the cases we currently
have tests for :) with the new features. The old @bind technique still
works for now.
Examples:
@* bind an input element to an expression *@
<input bind="@SelectedDate" format="mm/dd/yyyy" />
@functions {
public DateTime SelectedDate { get; set; }
}
@* bind an arbitrary expression to an arbitrary set of attributes *@
<div bind-myvalue-myevent="@SomeExpression">...</div>
@* write a component that supports bind *@
@* in Counter.cshtml *@
<div>...html omitted for brevity...</div>
@functions {
public int Value { get; set; } = 1;
public Action<int> ValueChanged { get; set; }
}
@* in another file *@
<Counter bind-Value="@CurrentValue" />
@functions {
public int CurrentValue { get; set; }
}
This builds upon existing support for UIEventHandler-typed component
properties and applies the same principle to any delegate type.
We try to help by generating the LSH of the lambda `=>` allowing you to
write `OnClick="Foo()"` rather than `OnClick="(e) => Foo()"`. You can of
course use @ as an escape.
The only rough edge here is that if the parameter names aren't memorable
for the delgate type, it's not super helpful.
Implements Component code generation and tooling support end to end
udditionally adds some default `@addTagHelper` directives to make
programming in Blazor a little nicer.
Components are discovered as Tag Helpers using Razor's extensibility
during the build/IDE process. This drives the code generation during
build and lights up a bunch of editor features.
Add
Ryan Nowak
Ryan Nowak
Steve Sanderson
flash2048