From dbd26ef9a382c3a78177c385abb41c3ab2905bd2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pranav K <prkrishn@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 11:46:47 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Chaning unit test to use Mock.Setup instead of setting it
 directly

---
 .../ActionResults/ObjectContentResultTests.cs                  | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/test/Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.Core.Test/ActionResults/ObjectContentResultTests.cs b/test/Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.Core.Test/ActionResults/ObjectContentResultTests.cs
index 56a12f8f75..9c1f94d589 100644
--- a/test/Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.Core.Test/ActionResults/ObjectContentResultTests.cs
+++ b/test/Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.Core.Test/ActionResults/ObjectContentResultTests.cs
@@ -35,10 +35,11 @@ namespace Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.Core.Test.ActionResults
             // Arrange
             var expectedContentType = "text/plain";
             var input = "testInput";
+            var stream = new MemoryStream();
 
             var httpResponse = new Mock<HttpResponse>();
             httpResponse.SetupSet(r => r.ContentType = expectedContentType).Verifiable();
-            httpResponse.Object.Body = new MemoryStream();
+            httpResponse.SetupGet(r => r.Body).Returns(stream);
 
             var actionContext = CreateMockActionContext(httpResponse.Object);